8.2.20

Lost books found

accidentally logged on to google docs with an old email and found this waiting, old enough that its formatting is apparently no longer compatible with the current google docs or something, leaving all those squiggly things. pretty sure this was a Rayuela, if i’d found this sooner, i might’ve tried to shoehorn it into Marienbad, etc., but since it’s too late, here it is copy-pasted fr googdocs as is (too lazy to edit). anyway, damn my younger self for not finishing this (i.a.), no idea where they were going with this.

Lost books

6:15pm, Monday. Eton Ramirez boarded the train just one stop away from the National Library. Security cameras have him in the National Library from around 6:21 to 6:43; upon arriving, he went directly to the Fiction and then the Poetry shelves, as if he knew all along exactly where the books he wanted were to be found. Around 6:45, he was standing in the crowd on the corner outside the library, unnoticed by anyone and waiting with everyone else for the light to change. He had borrowed four books: Nazi Literature in the Americas and The Romantic Dogs by Roberto Bolaño, translated by Chris Andrews and Laura Healy, respectively; The Train was on Time by Heinrich Boll, translated by Leila Vennewitz; Antipoems--How to Look Better and Feel Great by Nicanor Parra, پgantitranslatedپh by Liz Werner. Within the next hour he read as much of Nazi Literature and The Romantic Dogs as he could, feverishly turning page after page as though his life depended on it, then opened Antipoems at random and read exactly one line in English (پgThe commercialization of catastrophe:پh) and its counterpart in Spanish (پgLa comercializacion de la catastrofe:پh); he seemed to forget completely that he had the Boll. The Train was on Time found its way back to the library the following day; someone, a stranger, a good Samaritan, almost certainly not Ramirez himself, had slipped the book through the book return slot of the library bookdrop at the end of the day. A glitch in the system, a burst of solar radiation or cosmic rays, or an electromagnetic pulse, or maybe a cockroach or rat in the wiring, though none of these would later prove to be the case, prevented the event from being recorded by the security camera positioned over the book return slot, and the book was not found to have been returned until a few days later: in addition to the failure of the security camera, the book had somehow fallen out of the automated retrieval tray at the end of the bookdrop chute. No one could explain why no one had noticed until then. Only circumstances--the continuity of the security camera video recording, interrupted only at the end of the day after the book had been checked out, and the date of the last time the book had been borrowed, that is, the date it was checked out by Eton Ramirez--suggest the actual date and time the book had been physically returned to the premises. It was the first break, if it could be called a break, in the case, if it can be called a case. At any rate, chronologically speaking, it was the first indication that something, if anything, was amiss.

About a month before Eton Ramirez got on the train and made his way to the National Library, Anjelica Stendhal also visited the library and checked out three books: an omnibus edition of The Alexandria Quartet by Lawrence Durrell; Signs of Life by M. John Harrison; A Void by Georges Perec, translated by Gilbert Adair. The security cameras have her in the library from 11:10am, just after the library opened, to around 3:15pm. Anjelica Stendhal spent most of the time sitting in a corner reading the Penguin edition of Swann's Way by Marcel Proust, translated by Lydia Davis. She grew bored of the book after the first hour and kept looking up from her reading, staring unself-consciously now and then at the other visitors in the library as they quietly browsed the shelves, like vultures, she might have thought, their shoulders hunched as they peered at the titles on the spines arrayed before them, as oblivious of her watchful eyes as she was of the security camera lovingly trained on her beautiful, pale--almost deathly pale, so pale it was an almost featureless white blotch in the video recording--face. In the security camera recording, her eyes are the eyes of a blind woman: in the recording she looks Chinese, or at any rate Asian, but her eyes are impossibly blue. Of the three books she borrowed, none have yet been returned, nor is there anything else to indicate that any of them have ever been found.

Three days after the return of The Train was on Time was discovered, a man walked up to the customer service counter of the National Library to return a book. The counter girl, a bright-eyed Malay named Ana, looked up at the man and told him he could return the book through the book return slot at the bookdrop just outside the library's entrance. The man said, yes, he knew that, but no, he didn't want to do that, he wanted to return the book, of course, but it was not a book that he had borrowed. In other words, he wasn't there to simply return the book, he was also there to report that the book must have been borrowed by someone else, someone else who must have somehow lost it, and that he had found it and was now, in good faith, there to return it and report that the book had been lost and then found. It was then that Ana looked at the cover of the book the man was returning: an ominous, grainy, slightly defocused image of a man's bare back, shoulders hunched, arms spread out to the sides like wings, as though the man were preparing to take to the air, Ana thought, or maybe the man was already in the air, in the air against a dark--coal-dark, Ana said--night sky, and he was swooping down like a bird of prey, or some featherless carrion bird alighting on a carcass, or that he was pretending to be flying through the air, demonstrating some impressive aeronautical maneuver to an unseen audience, as if he--the man on the cover--were standing on a stage, facing an audience seated in the dark in front of him. It was the library's copy of Nazi Literature in the Americas. Ana thanked the man, who refused to give any of his details, and despite her best efforts the man left without another word, leaving the book in her hands. Checking the library records, Ana found that the book had been borrowed about a week ago by a man named Eton Ramirez, a name that was at once familiar to her from the circumstances, much talked about by the library staff, surrounding the finding of another of the books Ramirez had borrowed, The Train was on Time by Heinrich Boll. She called Ramirez through the contact number he had provided for his membership. Or tried to: the phone rang and rang, but no one answered. In an inexplicable fit of intuition, without trying to get in touch with Ramirez again, whether by phone or through any of the other means the library record suggested, Ana decided to inform the chief librarian. Soon it was discovered that Eton Ramirez had disappeared, disappeared so completely that it was as if he had never existed.

When asked to describe the man who had returned the book, Ana was surprised to find she could not recall him at all, just hours after she had seen and spoken with him, instead remembering only the image on the cover of Nazi Literature in the Americas, the image on the cover and what she thought upon seeing the image on the cover, a surprisingly vivid memory and a coherent (or incoherent) set of thoughts of course no one found very helpful. Consulting the security camera recordings of that day proved equally frustrating, not to say entirely baffling: the same interruption was found in the recordings as was observed in the recording from three days before, when The Train was on Time was returned through the book return slot. A survey of the library's surveillance system uncovered nothing wrong, nothing to explain those two blips, those glitches, those hiccups in the daily security recordings. In fact, there were no other interruptions in the recordings, which were comprehensive and comprehensively catalogued by the National Library's Security Department. What's more, the interruption barely even registered on the recording: a camera, trained on the customer service counter, caught only the edge of a shadow just beginning to appear on one corner of the screen--not even a shadow, nor even the edge of a shadow, really, but only a suggestion of the approach of a shadow, a barely perceptible darkness that seemed to loom just outside the frame of the camera's lens--and Ana, sitting alone behind the desk of the customer service counter, one moment with her hands empty, the next with the book in one hand, the other hand adjusting her spectacles, her eyes fixed on the image on the cover of the copy of Nazi Literature in the Americas. The clock indicated a jump of less than 10 minutes, about six or seven minutes, six or seven minutes that were lost to the world forever.

The connection to Anjelica Stendhal was not discovered--or, at any rate, not surmised--until about a week later, when members of the library staff attempted to contact her. The loan time for the books she had borrowed had lapsed, and members of the staff tried to get in touch with her to remind her that her books were due, and that she would have to pay the library a fine and either return the books immediately or, if she wanted to keep the books for much longer, renew the loan. Three members of the library staff are on record as having attempted to get in touch with her that day: none of them thought anything of their inability to get in touch with Stendhal and the matter was left for another day, more or less forgotten, at any rate not given another thought by anyone until it came to the attention of the chief librarian, an avid reader of detective and crime fiction, a fan of Patricia Highsmith and Patricia Cornwell and of the detective stories of G.K. Chesterton and Arthur Conan-Doyle, of Raymond Chandler and Dashiell Hammett, whose imagination had been set alight by and was still on fire from Eton Ramirez's disappearance. That a beautiful woman was now involved further inspired him to look more closely at what he began thinking of as a case, moreover as his case, and he began to imagine himself as a kind of Philip Spade. A slightly pudgy Philip Spade, a Philip Spade with no investigator's license, no license to investigate anything other than the prerogative of a chief librarian to examine the circumstances surrounding the borrowing and subsequent loss of books from the library. He remembered Ana from the previous week and, after asking again if she might not then have started to remember more from her encounter with the man who had returned the copy of Nazi Literature in the Americas, without really expecting that she would or, more likely, more in line with his temperament at the time, actually hoping that she would not (she didn't), the chief librarian asked her to retrieve any information the library might have on both Anjelica Stendhal and Eton Ramirez, and after having her print out three copies, one for each of them and one to be left behind, for reference, in his office on the premises of the National Library, invited her to join him to see, he said, if it might not be possible for them to find either Stendhal or Ramirez by going out and looking for them, physically, themselves.

They went first to the residential address given by Anjelica Stendhal, whose disappearance, at the time, had yet to be confirmed. What they found was what the chief librarian's imagination had led him to suspect all along: according to the landlord, a retired old man in his late 60s, but with the youth and vigor, even the appearance, of a man who was only in his 40s or 50s, a man who had used his hands to make an honest living for most of his life but was now happy to leave it all behind for a quiet life lived more or less in solitude, the kind of solitude that wasn't necessarily physical but conceptual or philosophical, tending to his properties, a set of rooms in a condominium just outside the boundaries of the commercial district of the city, as though he were not the owner but a housekeeper or chambermaid, occasionally even doing the laundry for his tenants and keeping their rooms clean in their absence, according to this old man Anjelica Stendhal had not been seen, by him or by any of the other tenants of the apartment, for about a month. She had paid an advance on her rent for three months, he said, without giving any reason, though he suspected she had been planning a long vacation, not unheard of for expatriates of a certain pay-grade, such as she was, and he had since kept her room in order, he said proudly, making sure her things were not disturbed in her absence, even bringing a kind of order to them, a subtle but distinct order to her things that was absent from the manner in which she tended her possessions, which was, he said without expounding further, less than ideal, and that would from experience certainly not be objectionable to her when she returned.

The room of Anjelica Stendhal was well maintained, as the landlord had given them to expect, if sparsely furnished. She had a bed, a chair, a small side table on which stood a lamp that was, the chief librarian thought approvingly, ideal for reading in bed, an escritoire, a wardrobe and a small, wooden bookshelf. The escritoire the chief librarian thought curiously empty, its surface free even of dust, the drawers containing little more than a few pens and some loose change in various currencies. The bookshelf, however, offered him a few things of interest: some books on physics and other sciences, including QED by Richard Feynman, The Problem with Physics by Lee Smolin, a few books by Michio Kaku and The Eye by Simon Ings. He was intrigued by Stendhal's library, which also contained a few volumes on history, politics and the social sciences, but no fiction, or nothing that was commonly thought of as fiction. Consulting the folder he had Ana print out for him provided an answer: Stendhal apparently acquired her fictional readings from the library; the records showed that she borrowed nothing but fiction, with no obvious preferences.

31.12.16

the score: 2016

weak.

2016
1. Animal Money, Michael Cisco
2. Nightwood, Djuna Barnes (5th read)
3. Self-reference ENGINE, Toh EnJoe (tr. Terry Galagher)
4. Solaris, Stanislaw Lem (tr. Bill Johnston)
5. Roadside Picnic, Arkady & Boris Strugatsky (tr. Olena Bormashenko)
6. Nova Swing, M.John Harrison (3rd read)
7. David Bowie.: The Little Black Book, David Buckley & David Bowie
8. The Soft Machine, William S. Burroughs
9. Nova Express, Burroughs
10. The Ticket That Exploded, Burroughs
William S. Burroughs, ed. Oliver Harris
11. The Soft Machine: The restored text, William S. Burroughs, ed. Oliver Harris
12. Nova Express: The restored text, William S. Burroughs, ed. Oliver Harris
13. The Ticket That Exploded: The restored text, William S. Burroughs, ed. Oliver Harris
14. Swans in Half-Mourning, Vi Khi Nao
15. Tripticks, Ann Quin
16. MM9, Hiroshi Yamamoto
17. This Census-Taker, China Mieville
18. The Necrophiliac, Gabrielle Wittkop (tr. Don Bapst)
19. The Vorrh, Brian Catling
20. The Three-Body Problem, Liu Cixin (tr. Ken Liu)
21. Lazarus: A musical by David Bowie and Enda Walsh
22. The Dark Forest, Liu Cixin (tr. Joel Martinsen)

30.12.15

the score: 2015

in 2015 i attempted to keep a semipseudosoderberghian accounting of my media consumption & but though not insane enough to take on PEAK TV i was still anyway thoroughly exhausted w/ the effort by November - i saw a few more movies, read/attempted to read a few more books (most notably DARK HOURS & THERE IS NO EMERGENCY, Conchitina Cruz; REPASO, Mona Lisa P. Cajucom, edited by Adam David; & but also embarked on but to date failed to complete: IN TRANSIT, Brigid Brophy; TESTAMENT, Hal Duncan; NOT DARK YET, Berit Ellingsen; ANIMAL MONEY, Michael Cisco), but at that point the year's persistent ennui/anhedonia-perhaps-depression had peaked to the point of preventing me from getting 'stuck in' any particular book - so the list ends there (& yes i am owning up to this accounting concluding w/ M. Night Shyamalan):

2015
1. Tomb(e), Hélène Cixous (tr. Laurent Milesi; 2014 Dec 24 - 2015 Jan 14)
2001: A Space Odyssey (Kubrick, 1968; 2015 Jan 17)
The Man in the High Castle (pilot, David Semel, 2015; 2015 Jan 19)
The One I Love (Charlie McDowell, 2014; 2015 Jan 20)
Blade Runner: The Final Cut (Scott, 1982; 2015 Jan 21)
Predestination (Spierig Brothers, 2014; 2015 Jan 21)
The Babadook (Jennifer Kent, 2014; 2015 Jan 21)
2. Monster & Madman, Steve Niles & Damien Worm (2015 Jan 21)
Two for the Road (Stanley Donen, 1967; 2015 Jan 22)
3. Passages, Ann Quin (2015 Jan 21 - 2015 Jan 22)
A Scanner Darkly (Richard Linklater, 2006; 2015 Jan 28)
12 Monkeys (Terry Gilliam, 1995; 2015 Feb 3)
4. Notes on Conceptualisms, Vanessa Place/Robert Fitterman (2015 Feb 10 - 2015 Feb 11)
The Day of the Doctor (Nick Hurran, 2013; 2015 Feb 17)
Birdman (Alejandro González Iñarritu, 2014; 2015 Feb 18)
The Limits of Control (Jim Jarmusch, 2009; 2015 Feb 18)
Honeymoon (Leigh Janiak, 2014; 2015 Feb 18)
5. Oh Pure And Radiant Heart, Lydia Millet (2014 Dec 24 - 2015 Feb 18)
The Time of the Doctor (Jamie Payne, 2013; 2015 Feb 19)
Star Trek: The Motion Picture (Robert Wise, 1979; 2015 Mar 1)
6. Manhattan Letters from Prehistory, Hélène Cixous (tr. Beverly Bie Brahic; 2015 Feb 18 - 2015 Mar 4)
Alien: Resurrection (Jean-Pierre Jeunet, 1997; 2015 Mar 4)
Dr. Who and the Daleks Invasion Earth 2150 (Gordon Flemyng, 1966; 2015 Mar 5)
The Grand Budapest Hotel (Wes Anderson, 2014; 2015 Mar 5)
Hotel Chevalier (Wes Anderson, 2007; 2015 Mar 6)
Over the Garden Wall (1-5; 2015 Mar 7)
Star Trek: The Motion Picture Director's Edition (Robert Wise, 2001; 2015 Mar 9)
Enemy (Denis Villeneuve, 2013; 2015 Mar 10)
The Quatermass Xperiment (Val Guest, 1955; 2015 Mar 10)
The Thin Red Line (Terence Malick, 1998; 2015 Mar 11)
Escape from Tomorrow (Randy Moore, 2013; 2015 Mar 11)
The Man Who Fell to Earth (Nicolas Roeg, 1976; 2015 Mar 12)
Interstellar (Christopher Nolan, 2014; 2015 Mar 16)
Interstellar (Christopher Nolan, 2014; 2015 Mar 16)
Sans Soleil (Chris Marker, w/ Alexandra Stewart, 1983; 2015 Mar 17)
Sans Soleil (Chris Marker, w/ Florence Delay, 1983; 2015 Mar 17)
Interstellar (Christopher Nolan, 2014; 2015 Mar 20)
Interstellar x2 (Christopher Nolan, 2014; 2015 Mar 21)
Interstellar (Christopher Nolan, 2014; 2015 Mar 23)
7. 'Comfort to the Hurt of the King' Catwoman: The New 52 #35 (Genevieve Valentine, Garry Brown, Lee Loughridge)
Solaris (Andrei Tarkovsky, 1972; 2015 Mar 24)
2001: A Space Odyssey (Stanley Kubrick, 1968; 2015 Mar 26)
Silent Running (Douglas Trumbull, 1972; 2015 Mar 27)
Lost in Translation (Sofia Coppola, 2003; 2015 Apr 22)
Interstellar (Christopher Nolan, 2014; 2015 Apr 23/24)
Winter Sleep (Nuri Bilge Ceylan, 2014; 2015 Apr 24)
8. Lucifer: The Morningstar Option (Mike Carey; 2015 Apr 24)
Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014; 2015 Apr 27)
Jupiter Ascending (Wachowski Brothers, 2015; 2015 Apr 30)
Interstellar (English audio descriptions; Christopher Nolan, 2014; 2015 May 4)
Dark Star (John Carpenter, 1974; 2015 May 11)
Inherent Vice (Paul Thomas Anderson, 2014; 2015 May 12)
9. La Medusa, Vanessa Place (2015 Mar 4 - 2015 May 14)
10. Weird Tales of a Bangalorean, Jayaprakash Satyamurthy (2015 May 15)
11. Kērotakis, Janice Lee (2015 May 15 - 2015 May 16)
12. Daughter, Janice Lee, photographs by Rochelle Ritchie Spencer (2015 May 17)
Mad Max 2: The Road Warrior (George Miller, 1981; 2015 May 18)
13. Damnation, Janice Lee (2015 May 17 - 2015 May 19)
Spring (Justin Benson, Aaron Moorhead, 2014; 2015 Jun 4)
The Skeleton Twins (Craig Johnson, DP Reed Morano, 2014; 2015 Jun 4)
Only Lovers Left Alive (Jim Jarmusch, 2013; 2015 Jun 4)
14. The Sparrow, Mary Doria Russell (2015 May 19 - 2015 Jun 7)
Kumiko, the Treasure Hunter (David Zellner, 2014; 2015 Jun 11)
Derelict (Ridley Scott, re-edited by Job Willins 2015; 2015 Jun 16)
15. The Driver's Seat, Muriel Spark (2nd read; 2015 Jun 17)
The Talented Mr. Ripley (Anthony Minghella, 1999; 2015 Jun 18)
Mad Max: Fury Road (George Miller, 2015; 2015 Jun 26)
Mad Max: Fury Road (George Miller, 2015; 2015 Jun 27)
16. Coming Through Slaughter, Michael Ondaatje (2015 Jun 28)
The Virgin Suicides (Sofia Coppola, 1999; 2015 Jul 1)
The Virgin Suicides (Sofia Coppola, 1999; 2015 Jul 2)
Lost in Translation (Sofia Coppola, 2003; 2015 Jul 3)
Lick the Star (Sofia Coppola, 1998; 2015 Jul 3)
Jupiter Ascending (Wachowskis, 2015)
17. Love Hotel, Jane Unrue (2015 Jul 16 - 2015 Jul 18)
Lucy (Luc Besson, 2014; 2015 Jul 22)
18. Sphinx, Anne Garréta (2015 Jul 19 - 2015 Jul 22)
Girl Most Likely (Shari Springer Berman, Robert Pulcini, 2012; 2015 Jul 23)
Hateship Loveship (Liza Johnson, 2013; 2015 Jul 24)
19. A Book So Red, Rachel Levy (2015 Jul 23 - 2015 Jul 24)
20. Near to the Wild Heart, Clarice Lispector (2015 Jul 31 - 2015 Aug 3)
21. The Passion According to G.H., Clarice Lispector (2015 Aug 3 - 2015 Aug 11)
The Taking of Deborah Logan (Adam Robitel, 2014; 2015 Aug 17)
The Nightmare (Rodney Ascher, 2015; 2015 Aug 18)
It Follows (David Robert Mitchell, 2014; 2015 Aug 20)
22. The Box Man, Kobo Abe (2nd read; 2015 Aug 15 - 2015 Aug 20)
Fantastic Four (Josh Trank, 2015; 2015 Aug 21)
Avengers: Age of Ultron (Joss Whedon, 2015; 2015 Aug 23)
The Skeleton Twins (Craig Johnson, DP Reed Morano, 2014; 2015 Aug 27)
Thor: The Dark World (Alan Taylor, 2013; 2015 Aug 30)
Diebuster (Kazuya Tsurumaki, 2004; 2015 Aug 31)
23. 10 Billion Days & 100 Billion Nights, Ryu Mitsuse (2015 Aug 11 - 2015 Aug 31)
Space Pirate Captain Harlock (Shinji Aramaki, 2013; 2015 Sep 3)
Vampire (Shunji Iwai, 2011; 2015 Sep 9)
Memories of Murder (Bong Joon-ho, 2013; 2015 Sep 14)
24. Fremder, Russell Hoban (2nd read; 2015 Sep 3 - 2015 Sep 14)
Jurassic World (Colin Trevorrow, 2015; 2015 Sep 20)
Get Smart (Peter Segal, 2008; 2015 Sep 20)
25. The Final Programme, Michael Moorcock (2nd read; 2015 Sep 11 - 2015 Sep 23)
The Final Programme (Robert Fuest, 1973; 2015 Sep 24)
Tomorrowland (Brad Bird, 2015; 2015 Sep 27)
King Kong (Peter Jackson, 2005 Ext. Ed; 2015 Oct 1)
26. A Cure for Cancer, Michael Moorcock (2015 Sep 23 - 2015 Oct 1)
Terminator: Genisys (Alan Taylor, 2015; 2015 Oct 4)
27. The Bridegroom was a Dog, Yoko Tawada (2015 Oct 2 - 2015 Oct 4)
Close Encounters of the Third Kind (Steven Spielberg, 1977; 2015 Oct 6)
War of the Worlds (Steven Spielberg, 2005; 2015 Oct 7)
War of the Worlds (Steven Spielberg, 2005; 2015 Oct 9)
28. Reconsolidation: Or, it's the ghosts who will answer you, Janice Lee (2015 Oct 10)
The Assassin (Hou Hsiao-Hsien, 2015; 2015 Oct 19)
The Assassin (Hou Hsiao-Hsien, 2015; 2015 Oct 20)
Blade Runner: The Workprint (Ridley Scott, 1982; 2015 Oct 23)
Inside Out (Pete Docter, 2015; 2015 Oct 24)
29. The English Assassin, Michael Moorcock (2015 Oct 1 - 2015 Nov 8)
The Visit (M. Night Shyamalan, 2015; 2015 Nov 10)

i realize going over this list that i watched INTERSTELLAR a ridiculous number of times this year, but while i love it it's Hou Hsiao-Hsien's THE ASSASSIN that is hands down the very BEST movie i saw this year. i also really really loved THE SKELETON TWINS.

next: Some Really Deep Thoughts On Television: https://twitter.com/skinnybdink/status/679830846610608128

PEAK TV just ab wore me out, man. lots of great new ones that i managed somehow not to fall for, or fell for but did not love, or loved but did not LOVE, or LOVED but briefly, the flame expiring all too soon as i found myself already cleansing the proverbial palate in prep for the Next Big Thing immediately after or even before The End; instead mostly only the ones i'd already formed relationships w/ in previous years really stuck: RECTIFY, most of all; DOCTOR WHO, of course - w/c while terrible in the first half i still contend as per one of the above tweets FINALLY made a proper case for an entry into someone's Best TV Shows 2015 List in the latter half; &, well. that's kinda about it. although, i still would like to make the case for underwatched things like BABYLON, HALT & CATCH FIRE, MANHATTAN, OTHER SPACE, TRANSPARENT, YOUNGER, some other things i'm sure i'm forgetting at the mo, & i may do so at some future point, but for now just assume you shld be watching these shows (when on/available to you) if you aren't already.

at the end of the year i do find myself w/ a few Single Best Episodes lingerloitering in my head - these singular eps weren't to my mind necessarily part of the very best shows of the year, but were good enough to rise above their respective shows/seasons to also distinguish themselves from the morass of PEAK TV in my head: 'Antipasto,' HANNIBAL; 'Cut Man,' DAREDEVIL (i'll just throw in here because i can: JESSICA JONES was a better show overall, but while its best eps 'AKA WWJD' & the one after that was almost a bottle ep in that crazy torture room that i'm too lazy to google right now were really strong eps, in context they don't really stand out as exemplary episodes the way the others i name here do, & certainly not the way 'Cut Man' stands out not just from the rest of DAREDEVIL, but from the rest of TV this year - i can no longer stomach DAREDEVIL because violence, but that episode (in brief not going into too much detail you'll already have heard ad nauseam from other critics) was masterfully constructed); 'A Town, A Gangster, A Festival,' DOCUMENTARY NOW - w/c i truly, sincerely feel shld be a new holiday tradition now that nobody seems to be watching IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE anymore.

3.3.15

in case it wasn't clear

here's another way to read this

The night we met, I have been thinking a long time about those words, about writing them down at the beginning of a sentence, and now that I have written them down at the beginning of this sentence I realize I still do not know how the rest of the sentence beginning with those words should go, how I should go on writing the sentence beginning with those words. It seems to me that writing that sentence would begin the story, and by beginning the story I would also be ending the story, or at least signaling the end of the story, because a story with a beginning must also have an end, while a story encountered in medias res need only go on, can be expected to go on, without beginning or end. This I suppose is why one would choose to begin writing in the middle, and though I might signal the end, I have not written the end, and by avoiding the beginning and the end I remain writing in the middle of the story, a story I am no longer certain I have the courage to write, a story that seems to me requires more courage to write than to live as it has been lived, as it is being lived; to write the story is to stop living it, and to stop living a story sometimes requires more courage than to continue living the story. Rather than continue writing, I have begun reading what I have written, everything I have written, trying to understand the relationship between everything I have written and the story I am writing, the story I have been trying to write. I have started writing between the parts that have already been written, shifting a paragraph here and there, removing some parts completely and restoring others that I had removed as soon as they had been written, which are then filed away elsewhere rather than discarded completely, creating a series of bifurcations and interpolations, following each bifurcation and interpolation in the way of Roubaud, but only keeping these bifurcations and interpolations, these departures from this writing, for myself, as though they might hold answers to questions I have not yet thought to ask, or have asked but do not yet recognize as questions that I have asked or need to ask. Everything in this writing exists in the gaps of the story, in spaces the story has left behind or has created, or has revealed to have always existed before and after the story. They exist outside the concentration of events that comprise the story I am writing, am trying to write, and this is the way I have found to continue both living and writing the story. This is how I have chosen to write; perhaps this is how I have always chosen to write, how I have always been able to write, how I can now write the sentence that begins The night we met, I have been thinking a long time about those words, about writing them down at the beginning of a sentence, and now that I have written them down at the beginning of this sentence I realize I still do not know how the rest of the sentence beginning with those words should go, how I should go on writing the sentence beginning with those words. It seems to me that writing that sentence would begin the story, and by beginning the story I would also be ending the story, or at least signaling the end of the story, because a story with a beginning must also have an end, while a story encountered in medias res need only go on, can be expected to go on, without beginning or end. This I suppose is why one would choose to begin writing in the middle, and though I might signal the end, I have not written the end, and by avoiding the beginning and the end I remain writing in the middle of the story, a story I am no longer certain I have the courage to write, a story that seems to me requires more courage to write than to live as it has been lived, as it is being lived; to write the story is to stop living it, and to stop living a story sometimes requires more courage than to continue living the story. Rather than continue writing, I have begun reading what I have written, everything I have written, trying to understand the relationship between everything I have written and the story I am writing, the story I have been trying to write. I have started writing between the parts that have already been written, shifting a paragraph here and there, removing some parts completely and restoring others that I had removed as soon as they had been written, which are then filed away elsewhere rather than discarded completely, creating a series of bifurcations and interpolations, following each bifurcation and interpolation in the way of Roubaud, but only keeping these bifurcations and interpolations, these departures from this writing, for myself, as though they might hold answers to questions I have not yet thought to ask, or have asked but do not yet recognize as questions that I have asked or need to ask. Everything in this writing exists in the gaps of the story, in spaces the story has left behind or has created, or has revealed to have always existed before and after the story. They exist outside the concentration of events that comprise the story I am writing, am trying to write, and this is the way I have found to continue both living and writing the story. This is how I have chosen to write; perhaps this is how I have always chosen to write, how I have always been able to write, how I can now write the sentence that begins The night we met, I have been thinking a long time about those words, about writing them down at the beginning of a sentence, and now that I have written them down at the beginning of this sentence I realize I still do not know how the rest of the sentence beginning with those words should go, how I should go on writing the sentence beginning with those words. It seems to me that writing that sentence would begin the story, and by beginning the story I would also be ending the story, or at least signaling the end of the story, because a story with a beginning must also have an end, while a story encountered in medias res need only go on, can be expected to go on, without beginning or end. This I suppose is why one would choose to begin writing in the middle, and though I might signal the end, I have not written the end, and by avoiding the beginning and the end I remain writing in the middle of the story, a story I am no longer certain I have the courage to write, a story that seems to me requires more courage to write than to live as it has been lived, as it is being lived; to write the story is to stop living it, and to stop living a story sometimes requires more courage than to continue living the story. Rather than continue writing, I have begun reading what I have written, everything I have written, trying to understand the relationship between everything I have written and the story I am writing, the story I have been trying to write. I have started writing between the parts that have already been written, shifting a paragraph here and there, removing some parts completely and restoring others that I had removed as soon as they had been written, which are then filed away elsewhere rather than discarded completely, creating a series of bifurcations and interpolations, following each bifurcation and interpolation in the way of Roubaud, but only keeping these bifurcations and interpolations, these departures from this writing, for myself, as though they might hold answers to questions I have not yet thought to ask, or have asked but do not yet recognize as questions that I have asked or need to ask. Everything in this writing exists in the gaps of the story, in spaces the story has left behind or has created, or has revealed to have always existed before and after the story. They exist outside the concentration of events that comprise the story I am writing, am trying to write, and this is the way I have found to continue both living and writing the story. This is how I have chosen to write; perhaps this is how I have always chosen to write, how I have always been able to write, how I can now write the sentence that begins The night we met, I have been thinking a long time about those words, about writing them down at the beginning of a sentence, and now that I have written them down at the beginning of this sentence I realize I still do not know how the rest of the sentence beginning with those words should go, how I should go on writing the sentence beginning with those words. It seems to me that writing that sentence would begin the story, and by beginning the story I would also be ending the story, or at least signaling the end of the story, because a story with a beginning must also have an end, while a story encountered in medias res need only go on, can be expected to go on, without beginning or end. This I suppose is why one would choose to begin writing in the middle, and though I might signal the end, I have not written the end, and by avoiding the beginning and the end I remain writing in the middle of the story, a story I am no longer certain I have the courage to write, a story that seems to me requires more courage to write than to live as it has been lived, as it is being lived; to write the story is to stop living it, and to stop living a story sometimes requires more courage than to continue living the story. Rather than continue writing, I have begun reading what I have written, everything I have written, trying to understand the relationship between everything I have written and the story I am writing, the story I have been trying to write. I have started writing between the parts that have already been written, shifting a paragraph here and there, removing some parts completely and restoring others that I had removed as soon as they had been written, which are then filed away elsewhere rather than discarded completely, creating a series of bifurcations and interpolations, following each bifurcation and interpolation in the way of Roubaud, but only keeping these bifurcations and interpolations, these departures from this writing, for myself, as though they might hold answers to questions I have not yet thought to ask, or have asked but do not yet recognize as questions that I have asked or need to ask. Everything in this writing exists in the gaps of the story, in spaces the story has left behind or has created, or has revealed to have always existed before and after the story. They exist outside the concentration of events that comprise the story I am writing, am trying to write, and this is the way I have found to continue both living and writing the story. This is how I have chosen to write; perhaps this is how I have always chosen to write, how I have always been able to write, how I can now write the sentence that begins The night we met, I have been thinking a long time about those words, about writing them down at the beginning of a sentence, and now that I have written them down at the beginning of this sentence I realize I still do not know how the rest of the sentence beginning with those words should go, how I should go on writing the sentence beginning with those words. It seems to me that writing that sentence would begin the story, and by beginning the story I would also be ending the story, or at least signaling the end of the story, because a story with a beginning must also have an end, while a story encountered in medias res need only go on, can be expected to go on, without beginning or end. This I suppose is why one would choose to begin writing in the middle, and though I might signal the end, I have not written the end, and by avoiding the beginning and the end I remain writing in the middle of the story, a story I am no longer certain I have the courage to write, a story that seems to me requires more courage to write than to live as it has been lived, as it is being lived; to write the story is to stop living it, and to stop living a story sometimes requires more courage than to continue living the story. Rather than continue writing, I have begun reading what I have written, everything I have written, trying to understand the relationship between everything I have written and the story I am writing, the story I have been trying to write. I have started writing between the parts that have already been written, shifting a paragraph here and there, removing some parts completely and restoring others that I had removed as soon as they had been written, which are then filed away elsewhere rather than discarded completely, creating a series of bifurcations and interpolations, following each bifurcation and interpolation in the way of Roubaud, but only keeping these bifurcations and interpolations, these departures from this writing, for myself, as though they might hold answers to questions I have not yet thought to ask, or have asked but do not yet recognize as questions that I have asked or need to ask. Everything in this writing exists in the gaps of the story, in spaces the story has left behind or has created, or has revealed to have always existed before and after the story. They exist outside the concentration of events that comprise the story I am writing, am trying to write, and this is the way I have found to continue both living and writing the story. This is how I have chosen to write; perhaps this is how I have always chosen to write, how I have always been able to write, how I can now write the sentence that begins The night we met, I have been thinking a long time about those words, about writing them down at the beginning of a sentence, and now that I have written them down at the beginning of this sentence I realize I still do not know how the rest of the sentence beginning with those words should go, how I should go on writing the sentence beginning with those words. It seems to me that writing that sentence would begin the story, and by beginning the story I would also be ending the story, or at least signaling the end of the story, because a story with a beginning must also have an end, while a story encountered in medias res need only go on, can be expected to go on, without beginning or end. This I suppose is why one would choose to begin writing in the middle, and though I might signal the end, I have not written the end, and by avoiding the beginning and the end I remain writing in the middle of the story, a story I am no longer certain I have the courage to write, a story that seems to me requires more courage to write than to live as it has been lived, as it is being lived; to write the story is to stop living it, and to stop living a story sometimes requires more courage than to continue living the story. Rather than continue writing, I have begun reading what I have written, everything I have written, trying to understand the relationship between everything I have written and the story I am writing, the story I have been trying to write. I have started writing between the parts that have already been written, shifting a paragraph here and there, removing some parts completely and restoring others that I had removed as soon as they had been written, which are then filed away elsewhere rather than discarded completely, creating a series of bifurcations and interpolations, following each bifurcation and interpolation in the way of Roubaud, but only keeping these bifurcations and interpolations, these departures from this writing, for myself, as though they might hold answers to questions I have not yet thought to ask, or have asked but do not yet recognize as questions that I have asked or need to ask. Everything in this writing exists in the gaps of the story, in spaces the story has left behind or has created, or has revealed to have always existed before and after the story. They exist outside the concentration of events that comprise the story I am writing, am trying to write, and this is the way I have found to continue both living and writing the story. This is how I have chosen to write; perhaps this is how I have always chosen to write, how I have always been able to write, how I can now write the sentence that begins